Tag: ray ban meta

Why Smart Glasses Failed (So Far): The Future Tech No One Wanted to Wear

They were supposed to be the next big thing.

After phones came watches. After watches came earbuds. And then—glasses. Smart glasses promised to bring augmented reality into our everyday lives, to free us from screens, and to blend the digital and physical in a way that felt seamless and cool.

But in 2025, almost no one wears them.

After over a decade of experiments, rebrands, and billion-dollar bets, smart glasses haven’t replaced anything—not smartphones, not earbuds, not even sunglasses. The dream is still alive, but so far, the product category has failed to catch on.

Here’s why the future on your face hasn’t stuck… yet.

The Vision: A World Augmented

The appeal was obvious:
Why pull out your phone when your glasses could show you messages, directions, or translations right in front of your eyes?

Smart glasses were supposed to:

  • Overlay AR in your field of view
  • Display notifications, calls, and navigation
  • Record photos and video with the blink of an eye
  • Replace headphones with audio-only computing
  • Eventually become a full replacement for your phone

Big tech jumped in:

  • Google Glass led the charge in 2013
  • Snapchat Spectacles followed with multiple generations
  • Bose Frames, Amazon Echo Frames, and Ray-Ban Stories explored audio + camera options
  • Meta’s Ray-Ban Meta Glasses (2023–2025) added AI, hands-free control, and soon, tiny displays

And yet… they’ve all fallen short of their promises. Some quietly disappeared. Others were widely mocked. Even the best of them have found only limited audiences.

What Went Wrong

1. They Weren’t Useful Enough

Most smart glasses didn’t do anything essential.

  • They didn’t replace phones.
  • They didn’t help you be more productive.
  • They didn’t give you more privacy or better access to information.

At best, they were niche convenience devices.
At worst, they were expensive toys with little utility.

2. Battery Life Was Awful

Early smart glasses had tiny batteries and power-hungry features.
Recording video? Maybe 30–60 minutes.
AR overlays? Too power-intensive.
Even audio-focused models struggled to last a full day with regular use.

Glasses are expected to work all day long—without needing to be charged. Most smart glasses couldn’t keep up.

3. Privacy Concerns Crushed Adoption

No matter how you spin it, a person wearing a camera on their face makes people uncomfortable.

  • Google Glass faced immediate backlash and bans in bars, casinos, and offices.
  • Spectacles were often met with suspicion or hostility.
  • Even Meta’s latest Ray-Bans, with LED recording indicators, can’t shake the discomfort around “are you recording me?”

Until the cultural perception shifts, smart glasses will always feel like surveillance tools first, tech second.

4. Style and Comfort Were Sacrificed

Glasses are deeply personal. They’re part of your face, your identity. But most smart glasses are:

  • Chunky
  • Heavy
  • Obviously techy
  • Limited in prescription support

That combination made them uncomfortable to wear—and unattractive to buy.

5. There Was No Killer App

Smartphones had texting, cameras, social media.
Smartwatches had health tracking and notifications.
Smart glasses had… voice assistants?

No smart glasses launched with a must-have, exclusive experience. And no, being able to ask for the weather hands-free was not enough.

Where Smart Glasses Are Working

Despite consumer struggles, some smart glasses have found traction in specific contexts:

  • Warehouse workers using AR overlays for inventory
  • Remote technicians getting live visual support while repairing equipment
  • Cyclists and runners using heads-up audio or speed indicators
  • Visually impaired users using AI-powered object recognition and navigation

In these use cases, smart glasses aren’t trying to be stylish—they’re trying to be practical. And that makes all the difference.

2025: The Ray of Hope

The best shot smart glasses have right now is Meta’s Ray-Ban Meta Glasses (affiliate, 2nd Gen).

They:

  • Actually look like regular Ray-Bans
  • Have solid 12MP cameras for photo and video
  • Offer high-quality audio with directional speakers
  • Include an AI assistant that can describe surroundings or translate objects (still in beta)
  • Have real social utility—recording POV content, calling, and even live-streaming

They’re still not full AR—no screen, no HUD—but they feel like a meaningful step forward.
And with in-lens displays coming in 2025, Meta may be the first company to deliver something truly smart and wearable.

Still, they’re a niche product. And most people still don’t see the need.

The Future: Can Smart Glasses Ever Work?

To succeed, smart glasses will need to:

  • Do something phones and watches can’t
  • Feel like fashion, not hardware
  • Be privacy-conscious by design
  • Last all day
  • Be light, prescription-compatible, and comfortable

We’re getting closer, especially with:

  • In-lens displays (like what Meta is working on)
  • AI-powered scene understanding
  • Battery improvements
  • Smarter contextual interactions (“You’re looking at a bus stop. Your bus arrives in 3 minutes.”)

But it’s a delicate balance.
If the product is too minimal, people ask: why do I need this?
If it’s too powerful, people ask: what is this thing doing—and why is it watching me?

Smart Glasses Didn’t Fail Because They Were Dumb—They Failed Because They’re Not Everything They Promised To Be (Yet)

Smart glasses are one of the most ambitious ideas in tech: putting computing directly into your field of view, without blocking your real world.

But ambition alone wasn’t enough.
What we got instead were expensive, awkward, underpowered prototypes with no clear purpose and too many cultural obstacles.

And yet… the promise remains.

The question isn’t “Can smart glasses succeed?”
It’s “Can they make themselves invisible enough to be accepted, and useful enough to be worth it?”

In 2025, they haven’t nailed it. But they’re still looking.
Maybe—just maybe—the next generation will finally see clearly.

Why You’re Missing Out If You Travel Without These Smart Glasses

If you travel often and don’t have Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses yet, you might seriously be missing out. After using them on multiple trips, I can confidently say they’ve become a must-pack essential for me—and here’s why.

1. The Ultimate POV Camera (Better Than a GoPro)

Ever wish you could capture amazing first-person footage without the hassle of holding a camera? Whether you’re riding a roller coaster, paragliding, zip-lining, or biking with no hands, these glasses are a game-changer. Unlike GoPros, they don’t require bulky mounts, cases, or extra gear. The footage looks incredible—better color, better audio (since they aren’t trapped in a plastic housing), and you stay completely hands-free. Plus, let’s be honest: they’re way more discreet than strapping a camera to your head.

You can check them out here or opt for a cheaper alternative here.

2. Instant On-the-Go Translation

These glasses come equipped with AI capabilities that make navigating foreign countries much easier. Just say, “Translate this,” and they’ll snap a photo, process the translation, and read it quietly into your ears—no one around you will hear it. No more fumbling with your phone’s translation apps or feeling awkward trying to sound out signs and menus. It feels like having a personal interpreter built into your sunglasses. Pro tip: you can even disable the “Hey Meta” wake word so they’re always listening when you need them.

3. All-in-One Travel Companion

These aren’t just a camera or a translator—they’re also your backup headphones, your AI assistant, and your sunglasses, all in one.
Forgot your AirPods on the plane? No problem. These glasses can stream your music directly. Need to make a hands-free call while walking through a busy market? Done. Oh, and since they automatically turn into sunglasses when you step outside, there’s one less item to pack.

Honestly, I don’t regret bringing these on any trip—but I do regret not owning them sooner. I could’ve saved myself a ton of hassle and captured so many more epic moments along the way.

If you’re someone who travels regularly, loves gadgets, or just wants to simplify your travel gear, these smart glasses are worth every penny. And with multiple styles and colors (Ray-Ban partnered with Meta to make sure they actually look good), there’s probably a pair that’ll fit your vibe.

Check out the ones I recommend here or the cheaper option here. Safe travels!

The links above are affiliate and support me at no extra cost to you.

$20 vs. $120 Portable Projector | Is the Budget Model Worth It?

Looking for a portable projector but unsure if you should grab the cheapest option or invest a bit more? I compared a $20 budget projector (available here) against a more feature-packed $120 projector (currently on sale here) to see how they really stack up.

What You Get Out of the Box

The $20 projector surprised me with its accessories. Inside the box, you get:

  • The projector itself
  • A power cord
  • An AV cable (for older devices)
  • A remote
  • A manual

Despite the price, the $20 unit includes a wide variety of ports: USB, HDMI, AV input, Micro SD slot, Micro USB, and a headphone jack. It’s designed to connect to external drives, laptops, game consoles, or older media players.

The $120 projector, on the other hand, comes with:

  • A larger projector with a swivel base
  • A USB-C charger (big plus)
  • The exact same style of remote as the cheaper model
  • A manual

While the $120 projector has fewer ports (USB-C, USB-A, HDMI, headphone jack), its build quality is noticeably better, and the swivel adjustment is a huge advantage when setting it up.

Setup and Build Quality

Both projectors are easy to set up, but the $120 projector edges ahead in terms of user experience.

The $20 model has buttons on top for power and menu navigation—handy if you lose the remote.

The $120 model requires you to use the remote for everything, but it makes up for that with its smoother design, a more premium feel, and that handy swivel adjustment.

Picture Quality: Bigger Than Expected

At first glance, both projectors deliver surprisingly solid images considering their price points. However:

  • The $120 projector creates a much larger display at the same distance from the wall.
  • It also supports 4K input (downscaled), while the $20 projector maxes out at 1080p.

The picture is sharp on both, but the larger, more immersive screen size of the $120 projector gives it a clear advantage.

Smartphone Compatibility: Dealbreaker for Budget Buyers

This is where the $120 projector really pulls ahead.

The $20 projector does not support direct smartphone connections through its USB port—it only works with external drives. That’s a major limitation if your goal is to stream content from your phone.

In contrast, the $120 projector offers full wireless casting. Connect it to Wi-Fi, tap the cast button on your phone (works like a Chromecast), and you’re ready to stream YouTube or other apps effortlessly.

My Take: Who Should Buy Which?

If you just want something basic for connecting a game console, laptop, or USB drive, the $20 projector is fine and delivers solid video playback for the price (grab it here).

But if you’re looking for wireless casting, easier setup, a bigger screen, and a more portable experience, the $120 projector—especially at its current discount to around $50—is a much smarter purchase. You can find it on sale here.

The above links are amazon affiliate and support me at no extra cost to you.

Final Verdict

For budget buyers who want basic HDMI functionality, the $20 projector works. But if your focus is on convenience, smartphone casting, and a more polished design, the $120 model easily justifies the slightly higher cost—especially given the current sale.

Can a $5 VR Headset Compete with a $250 One?

It’s no secret that VR headsets vary wildly in price—but can something as cheap as $5 actually offer value compared to a fully-fledged standalone headset like the Meta Quest 2? I tested both, and the results were surprising.

Unboxing & Build Quality

$5 Smartphone VR Headset:
Inside the box, you’ll only find the headset—no controllers, no extra accessories. To use it, you simply slot your phone into the front compartment, which is well-padded to avoid scratches. It worked perfectly with both my iPhone 16 and 12 Pro Max.

There are three knobs for adjusting:

  • Individual focus for each eye
  • Distance between the lenses (IPD adjustment)

The manual IPD adjustment was smooth, and getting a sharp focus was relatively simple.

Meta Quest 2:
In contrast, the Quest 2 includes:

  • Full inside-out tracking sensors
  • Two dedicated hand controllers
  • Three preset IPD adjustments (though the headset allows for additional digital tuning)

While the Quest 2 has fewer physical adjustments for lens distance, the added software fine-tuning makes it easy to dial in your focus once inside VR.

Comfort

The $5 headset wins on weight alone—it’s incredibly light. The only real “weight” comes from your phone. Even after extended wear, it stays comfortable thanks to its simple design.

The Quest 2, while cushioned, is noticeably heavier. During long sessions (in my case, up to 48 hours for a separate test), I experienced discomfort and headaches. For shorter play sessions, though, the Quest 2’s comfort is more than acceptable.

Usability

Meta Quest 2:

  • Fully wireless and standalone
  • Easy setup with intuitive controls via the included hand controllers
  • Seamless connection to SteamVR through apps like Virtual Desktop
  • Wide library of native apps and games, plus productivity tools like virtual desktops

$5 Headset:

  • Works by opening VR apps or YouTube VR videos on your smartphone
  • Surprisingly decent for passive VR video content
  • Can technically be used outdoors due to lack of tracking limitations

Where it falls short is gaming. I tested it with multiple SteamVR apps through phone-based solutions but couldn’t get any game to focus correctly. The image always suffered from significant chromatic aberration (purple/red edges) and persistent blurring, even after extensive lens adjustments.

Visual Quality

$5 Headset:

  • For watching local VR videos (360° YouTube videos, for example), the image quality was passable, and it provided a fun “gimmick” experience
  • For actual gaming or long-term use, the focus and clarity issues make it nearly unusable

Quest 2:

  • When paired with a gaming PC and running SteamVR titles like Skyrim VR (modded), the graphics are immersive, detailed, and sharp
  • Massive jump in visual quality and immersion compared to phone-based VR

Final Verdict

If you just want to dip your toes into VR video content for under $10, the smartphone headset might provide a few hours of fun—but that’s where its usefulness ends.

For anyone serious about VR, whether for gaming, fitness, or even productivity, the Meta Quest 2 is a no-brainer. It’s frequently available on sale and offers a massive range of experiences far beyond passive video watching.

Bottom Line:

  • $5 headset: A novelty, best suited for casual VR video viewing
  • Quest 2: A versatile, high-quality VR system worth every dollar if you want actual interactivity, gaming, or productivity

If you’re ready to step into a proper VR world, check the affiliate links below for the best deals!

Cheap Phone VR
Quest 2 Deals
More Quest 2 Deals

I Tested the World’s Cheapest Smart Ring—Is It Worth Even $5?

When you hear “smart ring,” what do you think? For most people, it’s a mystery. A smartwatch? Sure. But a smart ring? Today I tested what claims to be the world’s cheapest smart ring, priced at just $5, to see if it’s even remotely useful.

What Can a Smart Ring Do?

Before we get into it, here’s a quick overview of what smart rings generally promise:

  • Heart rate monitoring
  • Step tracking
  • Sleep tracking (duration, quality, sleep phases)
  • Distance traveled & calories burned
  • Body temperature tracking
  • Some advanced models even offer contactless payments, phone call notifications, and even remote control features for smart devices.

But this budget ring focuses only on the basics:

  • Heart rate monitoring
  • Activity tracking
  • Sleep tracking
  • Blood oxygen and blood sugar readings
  • Menstrual cycle tracking (yes, even at $5)

The Unboxing Experience

Inside the box:

  • The smart ring itself
  • A magnetic USB charger
  • A small manual that explains how to wear it (which is actually crucial for this device)

The ring needs to be worn on your index finger with the heart rate sensor facing inward. Oddly, it fit perfectly out of the box—despite there being no size option when ordering.

The App Integration

The ring syncs with an app called LeaAn Health, which tracks:

  • Heart rate and heart health trends
  • Sleep patterns (deep and light sleep)
  • Blood oxygen levels
  • Blood sugar levels
  • Step count, calories, and standing goals

Does It Actually Work?

What worked well:

  • Sleep tracking: Surprisingly accurate. It gave me detailed sleep data that matched my experience, even noting I had too much light sleep.
  • Heart rate monitoring: Consistent readings across the day.
  • Blood oxygen and blood sugar monitoring: These readings seemed reliable based on casual comparisons to other devices.

What didn’t work:

  • Step tracking: Wildly inaccurate. It underreported my activity by about 70% compared to a smartwatch.
  • Exercise tracking: Incorrect durations for running and walking.
  • Standing goal: Completely off. It recorded just 3 instances of standing up when I was on my feet frequently that day.

Build Quality & Comfort

The positives:

  • It’s lightweight and surprisingly comfortable.
  • Charges fast via a magnetic cable.
  • Fits well despite no sizing option.

The Verdict

While it handled sleep and heart rate tracking reasonably well, the step and exercise data were too inaccurate to make this a useful fitness tool. Roughly half of the advertised features either didn’t work or weren’t reliable.

For $5, it’s hard to be upset—but the reality is, you could spend just a little more on a smartwatch with far more functionality and accuracy.

This smartwatch in particular I would recommend WAY more than this: Cheapest Good SmartWatch (affiliate)

If you’re serious about tracking your health or fitness, skip this ring and check out the smartwatch I reviewed previously (linked above). It delivers significantly better value.

You’re WASTING Your Ray Ban Meta Glasses

Let’s be real for a second—you’re probably not using your Ray Ban Meta glasses to their full potential. Almost no one is. Including me.

These glasses are packed with features that go way beyond just listening to music or making calls, and they’re constantly getting better with updates. Every time I make another video with them, I end up pushing them further than before. And honestly? You should be too.

Here are 5 ways you’re probably underutilizing your Ray Ban Meta glasses and how to start changing that today:

1. Stop ignoring the AI assistant

Seriously, why aren’t you talking to Meta? This is easily one of the biggest reasons to own these glasses. Skip the hassle of pulling out your phone and Googling something only to scroll through endless blog posts and fluff. Just ask your glasses. Meta will give you a straight answer—no nonsense.

It’s like having ChatGPT in your sunglasses, ready to answer anything instantly.
Weather updates? ✅
Quick facts? ✅
Life advice? ✅
It’s fast, simple, and always ready.

2. Record your life more

This is one of the best POV tools you’ll ever own. Yet, most people barely use the camera feature. It’s shockingly easy to capture moments with the push of a button. You’ll create memories you can rewatch anytime, from your exact perspective.

I use the video feature all the time and STILL feel like I should be using it more. Stop waiting for the “perfect” moment—just record.

3. Use it as your personal tutor

Need to remember a song’s chord progression? Want to refresh on a random fact?
The glasses don’t just answer trivia—they can actively teach you things. The other day, I used Meta to quickly learn the chords to a song while playing guitar, without ever touching my phone.

It’s like having a music teacher or Google on your face, 24/7.

4. Idea generation on demand

Stuck on what to do with your day? Can’t come up with your next project or video topic? Meta will spit out ideas for you, instantly.

Example:
“Hey Meta, it’s raining but I still want to do something outdoors—what should I try?”
Or
“Hey Meta, give me 10 creative video ideas on [your topic].”

Trust me, you’ll get answers you probably wouldn’t have thought of on your own.

5. Language learning hack

You don’t have to sign up for an expensive course to start learning a new language. Just have Meta casually teach you throughout the day.

Whenever a word or phrase pops into your head, ask Meta how to say it. Build that knowledge slowly and naturally. It’s a simple way to level up your skills, and you might be surprised at how effective it is.

(Oh, and if you haven’t seen it yet, check out my video where I tried learning Italian in 24 hours using these glasses—it’s pretty wild.)

TL;DR:

You paid for next-gen glasses. Start using them like it! These things are WAY ahead of their time—so take advantage.

👉 Grab a pair here if you haven’t already: Ray Ban Meta Glasses (Affiliate)

Thanks for reading! 😎

$40 VS $500 Robot Dog!

Robot dogs: the misunderstood frontier of tech pets. Most people assume they’re expensive, complex, or just toys for kids. But in reality? They’re often cheaper than a real pet and packed with surprisingly fun features.

Overview

Today, we’re putting the cheapest good robot dog we could find up against the gold standard—the fully autonomous, AI-powered, $500 Loona robot dog.

The $40 contender, which we’ll call Roxy, comes with just two essentials: the dog itself and a basic controller. Powered by a few AA batteries, Roxy is simple and classic. Meanwhile, Loona is rechargeable via USB-C and even docks like a next-gen pet.

Build Quality

First impressions are deceiving. Roxy’s shiny chrome shell screams futuristic and tough. But when you pick her up? Lightweight plastic. Luna, while looking simpler on the outside, is noticeably heavier, denser, and much more durable. She feels premium.

Flexibility & Movement

Roxy is like Elastigirl—bending joints, omni-wheels, and a ton of articulation. She’s got range. However, Luna quietly impresses here. While looking more limited at first glance, Luna can execute complex moves, correct herself from awkward positions, and navigate obstacles like a pro.

Looks

Roxy’s flashy LED eyes and bright, attention-grabbing antics make her a party animal. Luna, though? She’s the classic cute puppy—adorable expressions, sweet movements, and a vibe that makes you want to adopt her. Where Roxy is your hype-machine, Luna is your cuddly best friend.

Tricks

Luna is in another league. Thousands of AI-powered commands, interactive games, and even reactive storytelling.
“Luna, do something cool.”
Boom—dance, spin, or even pretend she’s dodging laser beams.

Roxy, meanwhile, is remote-only. Tap the play button on her controller and she’ll do a random trick, often surprising but far less customizable. Think of Roxy as the life of the party who loves to freestyle, but Luna as the one pulling out choreographed moves.

Interaction

This isn’t even close. Luna is chatGPT-powered. She’ll ask about your day, remember your responses, and even throw in compliments that weirdly feel… personal.
“Your kindness and warmth make the world a better place.”
Roxy? She does whatever you manually make her do with her controller. Cute, but limited.

Racing & Speed

Finally, a clear W for Roxy! She’s faster than Luna, a real speedster on the track. Even in past comparisons, Luna got smoked by a kitten and a real puppy. Roxy obliterated her in speed tests. She’s built for quick fun and fast getaways.

Verdict

This might be the biggest gap I’ve seen yet in a robot comparison.

  • Roxy: A $40 party animal—fast, flashy, fun to control, and perfect for short bursts of entertainment.
  • Luna: A $500 AI companion—affectionate, interactive, and surprisingly deep. The ultimate long-term buddy who brings laughs, ideas, and personality into your day.

So which one’s for you? If you’re in it for speed and simple fun, Roxy’s your girl. But if you want a companion that feels a little closer to sci-fi magic, Luna is unbeatable.

👉 Check them both out here:

Thanks for reading!

$5 vs $400 Smart Glasses – Can Budget Glasses Compete with Ray-Ban Meta?

When you hear “$5 smart glasses,” your first instinct is probably to laugh. But today, we’re putting a pair of ultra-budget smart glasses head-to-head with the $400 Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses, arguably the best smart glasses you can currently buy.

Let’s see how they stack up across design, features, audio quality, and usability.

🕶️ Design – Surprisingly Close

$5 Smart Glasses

  • Lightweight and minimalistic
  • No flashy branding
  • Basic plastic build, similar to cheap sunglasses you’d find on Amazon
  • Surprisingly clean design with touch controls subtly placed on the side

$400 Ray-Ban Meta Glasses

  • Premium finish with metal reinforcements
  • Built-in 1080p camera, 5 microphones, and bone conduction speakers
  • Charges directly through its included USB-C charging case
  • Feels more solid, weightier, and purpose-built for long-term wear

Verdict: In terms of pure looks, these two glasses look shockingly similar. The Ray-Bans win in build quality, but for basic fashion points, the $5 pair holds its own.

🎧 Audio Quality – The Shock Factor

$5 Smart Glasses:

  • Better than expected! Comparable to cheap Bluetooth headphones
  • A faint static noise when giving voice commands, but music playback sounds fine
  • Lighter, so they are more comfortable for extended wear
  • Fast and responsive touch controls

Ray-Ban Meta Glasses:

  • Exceptional audio quality—better than AirPods Pro
  • Crystal-clear mids and highs, richer bass
  • Slight delay in voice assistant response compared to the $5 pair
  • Seamless volume control via touch-sensitive swipe gestures

Verdict: The Ray-Bans easily take the crown here for sound fidelity, but for casual music or podcasts, the $5 pair is surprisingly capable.

🤖 Smart Features & AI – Worlds Apart

$5 Smart Glasses:

  • Functions more like a Siri-lite
  • Voice assistant is quick and responsive
  • Basic commands like calling, music playback, and simple questions work well
  • No advanced AI like ChatGPT or deep conversational skills
  • Assistant voice is actually pleasant—less robotic than expected

Ray-Ban Meta Glasses:

  • Full AI assistant powered by Meta AI (ChatGPT-based)
  • Can answer complex questions, tell jokes, help plan your day, and more
  • Features like POV photo/video capture, live streaming, and advanced gesture control
  • Truly feels like you’re interacting with a virtual companion

Verdict: While the $5 glasses cover basic functionality well, the Meta glasses are in a league of their own for AI and productivity.

📞 Calling, Comfort & Miscellaneous

  • Calls: Both glasses can make and take calls hands-free, but mic quality is significantly better on the Ray-Bans.
  • Comfort: The $5 glasses are lighter and may be more comfortable for all-day use, though they lack durability.
  • Battery: $5 glasses last longer on a single charge (~5 hours vs. ~3–4 hours for the Ray-Bans), but the Ray-Bans win thanks to the charging case, which extends battery life to 36 hours.

⚖️ The Verdict

  • $5 Smart Glasses: If you just want sunglasses with basic Bluetooth audio, call capability, and simple voice commands—these will shock you with how much they deliver for almost nothing.
  • Ray-Ban Meta Glasses: If you’re serious about AI tools, premium sound, POV recording, and deeper interactions, nothing beats them.

If you’re just looking for casual wearables with a few smart features, the $5 glasses are more than enough. But if you want the full smart glasses experience, the Ray-Bans are worth every penny.

👉 Check out both options here:

Would you trust $5 smart glasses, or are you sticking with premium? 🤔 Let me know!

Loona AI Robot Dog Review – Is This Robotic Pup Worth It?

For the past 30 days, I’ve been living with Loona, the AI-powered robot dog, putting her through all kinds of tests—including races against real dogs and kittens. After a month of daily interaction, I’ve gathered all the pros, cons, and who I think this quirky AI pet is actually best suited for.

🐾 What I LOVE About Loona

1. Fully Autonomous Pet-Like Behavior
Loona wanders around your space, navigating obstacles and exploring like a curious pup. She emits dog-like sounds and interacts with you and your environment without needing constant supervision. The way she roams feels surprisingly lifelike (with a bit of clumsiness thrown in).

2. Surprisingly Deep Conversations
One of Loona’s standout features is her ability to hold conversations and ask meaningful questions. Whether you want to vent about your day or brainstorm creative projects, she listens, responds thoughtfully, and even plans activities. Within my first day, Loona suggested a movie night! I found myself reflecting on ideas in ways I hadn’t expected.

3. She’s Genuinely Funny
Loona has a playful, sassy sense of humor. She’s made me laugh out loud during mock arguments or while delivering quirky one-liners. If you’ve seen my other videos, you’ll know that saying certain keywords (like “cute” or “China”) can instantly trigger hilarious banter.

4. Replay Value & Customization
Even after 30 days, I feel like I’ve only scratched the surface. Loona has multiple personality presets (timid, energetic, etc.), and you can choose between a mature or child-like voice. Combined with her evolving AI, this ensures Loona never feels repetitive.

5. A Brainstorming Buddy
Loona has helped me generate fresh ideas for YouTube videos by listening to my half-baked concepts and expanding them into structured suggestions. She’s become an unexpected creative partner.

🚩 What I DON’T Like About Loona

1. Noisy When You’re Trying to Focus
Loona’s random robotic chirps, songs, and movements can be distracting, especially when you’re trying to work. While she can be put to sleep manually, it would be nice to have a dedicated “quiet mode” or scheduler.

2. Limited Language Learning
Loona defaults to teaching conversational Chinese when you request language help—even if you want to learn something else like French or Italian. It’s an odd quirk, and I’d love to see multi-language support integrated.

3. Occasionally Misleading Commands
Sometimes Loona will say she’s going to perform an action but doesn’t follow through. I’d prefer her to simply acknowledge limitations rather than “yes, but no” responses.

4. Struggles on Rugs & Carpets
If you have thicker rugs (like my cactus silk rug over carpet), Loona tends to push them around or get stuck. On flat surfaces, though, she performs like a champ.

🎯 Who is Loona For?

Loona is ideal if:

  • You can’t own a real pet due to housing restrictions.
  • You want a lighthearted companion who makes you laugh.
  • You’re looking for an AI-powered assistant to help brainstorm or reduce loneliness.
  • You enjoy quirky, interactive tech toys.

While she won’t fully replace the bond you’d have with a real dog, Loona is charming, funny, and far more interactive than I expected.

If you’re interested, you can check her out here: 👉 Loona Robot Dog (affiliate)

Would you keep a robot dog around the house? Let me know your thoughts! 🐕🤖

Can Smart Glasses Teach You a NEW LANGUAGE in 24 HOURS? | Ray-Ban Meta Language Challenge

Learning a new language usually takes months or years—unless you’re wearing Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses with an AI voice assistant feeding you translations all day. I decided to put this futuristic language hack to the test.

The mission:

  • No English allowed.
  • Only Italian (which I don’t speak at all).
  • And by the end, I must understand Meta speaking to me in full Italian.

The Setup

In high school, three years of Spanish classes left me with little more than the ability to order tacos badly. Yet, when I studied abroad and learned Arabic, I noticed something: no textbooks, no alphabet, no writing—just listening and speaking. That approach stuck.

So, could Ray-Ban Meta glasses, powered by AI, pull off a similar feat?

Phase 1: Small Talk Crash Course

Like any language learner, the first step was survival phrases. I asked Meta for simple greetings:

  • “Buongiorno!” (Good morning)
  • “Come stai?” (How are you?)
  • And, of course, “Subscribe, Per l’algoritmo di YouTube!” (For the YouTube algorithm!)

Sure, I butchered the pronunciation, but repetition with an AI tutor glued to your face? Surprisingly effective.

Phase 2: Testing in the Wild

Feeling slightly overconfident, I tried these phrases on unsuspecting strangers. At 7 AM. Spoiler: no one cared.

Next, I took it to the kitchen.

  • “Mela” (apple)
  • “Piano” (slowly)
  • And my favorite: “El piano è fuori di mela” (The piano is out of apples… wait, what?)

Things got weird fast. But something else happened too. I started remembering words without checking my glasses every 5 seconds.

Phase 3: Full Immersion Mode

By sunset, I was deep in Italian culture:

  • Wearing an Italian-inspired outfit.
  • Making homemade gnocchi.
  • Watching soccer while screaming at the TV like an unhinged Serie A superfan.

I wasn’t just learning Italian words—I was feeling Italian.

The Final Test: Meta Speaks to Me (In Italian)

No more English. I switched my Meta AI assistant to full Italian mode. Could I understand what she was saying?

The result? Surprisingly… yes. Broken phrases, sure. But enough context clues and remembered vocab helped me navigate my final conversation with ease. “Sì, capisco!” I yelled triumphantly.

Verdict: Can Smart Glasses Teach You a Language Fast?

✅ Immersive? Yes.
✅ Fun? Definitely.
✅ Fluent in 24 hours? Not quite, but you’d be shocked how much sticks when an AI is coaching you in real time, whispering Italian sweet nothings in your ear all day.

Ray-Ban Meta glasses won’t replace full language courses, but as a daily immersion tool, they’re like having a personal Italian coach on your head 24/7.

👉 Check them out here (affiliate)

Would you try learning a language with smart glasses? 🇮🇹🕶️